Module code: 946

📚 Too Good A Deal B1B2

📚 When a Deal Seems Too Good to Be True B1B2

🎯 10 grammar forms💬 26 examples

📖 Story Summary

A major European electronics retailer accidentally listed premium tablets at just seventeen dollars instead of the usual thousand-dollar price. Loyal customers spotted the deal near Black Friday, ordered online, and successfully picked up their tablets in stores. Eleven days later, the company sent an email claiming the price was a technical error and offered two options: pay most of the original price with a small discount, or return the tablet for a refund plus a voucher. This situation raises complex legal questions about when pricing mistakes create binding contracts. The answer depends on recognizability—whether a reasonable customer should have known it was an error. Modern retail has made this harder to judge because extreme discounts through flash sales and viral marketing campaigns are now common. Courts in different jurisdictions have ruled differently on similar cases involving airlines and hotels. The case sits in a legal gray area where reasonable people disagree about fairness and legality.

🎯 Grammar Showcase

Present Perfect Simple B1B2
4 instances in text

Present Perfect connects past events to the present situation, showing how earlier actions created the current legal debate. In this text, it describes similar cases that inform today's understanding and changes in retail that affect current consumer expectations. Notice how it emphasizes the relevance of past developments to the present discussion.

→ Present Perfect — recent past with present relevance

“Similar cases have played out elsewhere.”

“Airlines have accidentally listed business class tickets at economy prices.”

→ Present Perfect — past action creating present result

“In some jurisdictions, courts have sided with consumers, ruling that a published price is an offer that, once accepted, creates a binding contract.”

“Today, however, flash sales, app-only deals, and viral marketing stunts have made extreme discounts part of the landscape.”

Passive Voice B1B2
7 instances in text

Passive voice shifts focus from who did the action to what happened or what was affected. Throughout this legal story, passives emphasize the tablets, the customers, and the actions rather than specific agents. This creates an objective, analytical tone appropriate for discussing legal cases.

→ Passive Voice — focus on affected object

“Loyalty cardholders discovered tablet computers listed at ninety-eight percent off the regular price.”

“Tablets were handed over without any questions.”

“It's listed for just seventeen dollars.”

→ Passive Voice — agent unknown or unimportant

“Many legal systems allow contracts to be voided if an error is both fundamental and recognizable to the other party.”

First Conditional B1B2
2 instances in text

First Conditional presents real, likely scenarios and their consequences. The opening questions use this to engage readers directly, while the legal discussion uses it to explore realistic outcomes. This form is essential for discussing possibilities and their implications.

→ First Conditional — real future possibility

“Do you click buy? And if you do, can the company take it back later?”

“Many legal systems allow contracts to be voided if an error is both fundamental and recognizable to the other party.”

Contrast Connectors B1B2
5 instances in text

Contrast connectors signal opposing ideas or unexpected turns in the argument. This legal story constantly presents different perspectives—what seemed legitimate versus what the retailer claimed, past practices versus modern retail, different court decisions. These connectors help readers track the shifting viewpoints.

→ Contrast Connectors — signaling opposing information

However, eleven days later, those same customers received a surprising email.”

“They offered two options: pay most of the original price to keep the tablet (although with a modest discount), or return it for a refund plus a small voucher.”

“Today, however, flash sales, app-only deals, and viral marketing stunts have made extreme discounts part of the landscape.”

Result Connectors B1B2
2 instances in text

Result connectors show cause-and-effect relationships, making logical connections explicit. In this analytical text, they help readers follow the reasoning about why modern retail practices affect legal judgments about pricing errors.

→ Result Connectors — showing consequence

Therefore, a customer might reasonably think a massive discount is a loss-leader promotion or a social media marketing campaign.”

Modal Verbs (Speculation and Possibility) B1B2
6 instances in text

Modals express degrees of certainty, possibility, and obligation throughout this legal discussion. They're crucial for hedging—presenting ideas as possible rather than certain—which is essential in legal and analytical writing. Notice how 'might,' 'could,' 'can,' and 'would' soften claims and acknowledge uncertainty.

→ Modal Verbs — expressing possibility

“Therefore, a customer might reasonably think a massive discount is a loss-leader promotion or a social media marketing campaign.”

“And if you do, can the company take it back later?”

→ Modal Verbs — hypothetical past

“Twenty years ago, a ninety-eight percent discount would have been obviously wrong.”

Defining Relative Clauses B1B2
4 instances in text

Defining relative clauses add essential information that identifies which person, thing, or situation we're talking about. They allow complex ideas to be expressed in single, flowing sentences rather than choppy separate statements. Common in analytical writing for building detailed descriptions.

→ Defining Relative — identifying which thing/situation

“The deal appeared legitimate because it was near Black Friday, when extreme discounts are common.”

“It sits in that uncomfortable middle ground where reasonable people disagree about what's fair and what's legal.”

“In some jurisdictions, courts have sided with consumers, ruling that a published price is an offer that, once accepted, creates a binding contract.”

Past Simple A2
15 instances in text

Past Simple narrates the sequence of completed events in this story. It forms the backbone of the chronological account—what customers did, what the retailer did, and what happened in similar cases. Foundation tense for storytelling and reporting past events.

→ Past Simple — completed narrative events

“Loyalty cardholders discovered tablet computers listed at ninety-eight percent off the regular price.”

“Customers ordered online and chose in-store pickup.”

“The retailer claimed the price was clearly an error—a technical glitch on their platform.”

Gerunds and Infinitives B1B2
4 instances in text

Gerunds (-ing forms) and infinitives (to + verb) follow specific verbs and serve various functions. This text shows gerunds after prepositions and as subjects, plus infinitives expressing purpose. These forms allow more sophisticated sentence construction than simple verb chains.

→ Gerund — after preposition

“That's different from catching an error before fulfillment and canceling orders.”

→ Infinitive — expressing purpose

“In the second, someone purchases five tablets and immediately lists them for resale.”

Present Simple A2
12 instances in text

Present Simple states facts, general truths, and describes how things work in the legal system. Throughout this analytical piece, it presents current legal principles, expert opinions, and general statements about retail practices. Foundation tense for explanatory and factual writing.

→ Present Simple — stating facts and general truths

“This situation raises a fascinating legal question: when is a price mistake actually binding?”

“The answer depends largely on something called recognizability.”

“The timing matters too.”

📊 Level Analysis

🎯 Target Level Forms

Present Perfect Simple, Passive Voice, First Conditional, Contrast Connectors (however, although), Result Connectors (therefore), Modal Verbs (speculation), Defining Relative Clauses, Gerunds and Infinitives

📗 Foundation Forms

Past Simple, Present Simple

💡 Study Tip

Focus on the B1B2 forms—especially how Present Perfect connects past cases to current legal thinking, and how contrast connectors help you follow complex arguments with multiple viewpoints.

Grammar Practice: When a Deal Seems Too Good to Be True

Test your understanding of the grammar forms from the story.

Forms covered: Past Simple, Present Simple, Passive Voice, Modal Verbs (Speculation and Possibility), Contrast Connectors

Past Simple🔍 Find the error

Which sentence contains an error in Past Simple for completed events?

Past Simple✏️ Complete the sentence

Complete the sentence describing completed actions in sequence: 'Customers _____ online and _____ in-store pickup.'

Past Simple🔍 Find the error

Which sentence uses Past Simple correctly for a completed past action?

Present Simple✏️ Complete the sentence

Complete the sentence stating a general legal principle: 'The answer _____ largely on recognizability.'

Present Simple🔍 Find the error

Which sentence contains an error in Present Simple for stating current facts?

Present Simple✏️ Complete the sentence

Complete the sentence expressing a general truth: 'The timing _____ too in legal cases.'

Passive Voice🔍 Find the error

Which sentence contains an error in Passive Voice structure?

Passive Voice✏️ Complete the sentence

Complete the sentence focusing on what happens to contracts: 'Contracts can _____ if the error is recognizable.'

Passive Voice✏️ Complete the sentence

Complete the sentence emphasizing the product rather than who listed it: 'The tablet _____ for just seventeen dollars.'

Modal Verbs (Speculation and Possibility)🔍 Find the error

Which sentence contains an error in using modals for speculation?

Modal Verbs (Speculation and Possibility)✏️ Complete the sentence

Complete the question about possibility: '_____ the company take it back later?'

Modal Verbs (Speculation and Possibility)✏️ Complete the sentence

Complete the hypothetical past statement: 'Twenty years ago, this discount _____ obviously wrong.'

Contrast Connectors🔍 Find the error

Which sentence uses a contrast connector incorrectly?

Contrast Connectors✏️ Complete the sentence

Complete the sentence showing contrast: 'Pay the original price (_____ with a modest discount).'

Contrast Connectors✏️ Complete the sentence

Complete the sentence contrasting past and present: 'Twenty years ago, such discounts were obviously wrong. Today, _____, they are common.'

Page 2 of 2 Next (Coming Soon) →